🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.